Viscoelastic characterization of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene

by

Viscoelastic characterization of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene

Szczepan Witek

AGH University of Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2023.2.0813

Abstract:

The main objective of this work was to characterize the viscoelastic properties of additively manufactured Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene based on tensile stress relaxation tests. The stress relaxation measurements were conducted with a temperature range of  The two-layer viscoplastic constitutive model was adopted to describe the elastic and viscous behavior of the investigated material. The model parameters were calibrated using an inverse analysis and stress relaxation data. The model’s predictive capabilities were assessed by comparing the model predictions with experimental data not included in the calibration process.

Cite as:

Witek, S. (2023). Viscoelastic characterization of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Computer Methods in Materials Science, 23(2), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2023.2.0813

Article (PDF):

Keywords:

Fused filament fabrication, Two-layer viscoplastic model, Stress relaxation, ABS

References:

Berezvai, S., & Kossa, A. (2020). Performance of a parallel viscoelastic-viscoplastic model for a microcellular thermoplastic foam on wide temperature range. Polymer Testing, 84, 106395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106395.

Casavola, C., Cazzato, A., Moramarco, V., & Pappalettera, G. (2017). Residual stress measurement in Fused Deposition Modelling parts. Polymer Testing, 58, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.01.003.

Cattenone, A., Morganti, S., Alaimo, G., & Auricchio, F. (2019). Finite element analysis of additive manufacturing based on fused deposition modeling: Distortions prediction and comparison with experimental data. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 141(1), 011010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041626.

Doh, J., Hur, S.H., & Lee, J. (2018). Viscoplastic parameter identification of temperature-dependent mechanical behavior of modified polyphenylene oxide polymers. Polymer Engineering and Science, 59(S1), E200-E211. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24910.

Gonabadi, H., Chen, Y., Yadav, A., & Bull, S. (2022). Investigation of the effect of raster angle, build orientation, and infill density on the elastic response of 3D printed parts using finite element microstructural modeling and homogenization techniques. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 118, 1485–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07940-4.

Guedes, R.M., Singh, A., & Pinto, V. (2017). Viscoelastic modelling of creep and stress relaxation behaviour in PLA-PCL fibres. Fibers and Polymers, 18(12), 2443–2453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-017-7479-y.

Hanon, M.M., Dobos, J., & Zsidai, L. (2020). The influence of 3D printing process parameters on the mechanical performance of PLA polymer and its correlation with hardness. Procedia Manufacturing, 54, 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.07.038.

Hikmat, M., Rostam, S., & Ahmed, Y.M. (2021). Investigation of tensile property-based Taguchi method of PLA parts fabricated by FDM 3D printing technology. Results in Engineering, 11, 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100264.  

Kossa, A., & Horváth, A.L. (2021). Powerful calibration strategy for the two-layer viscoplastic model. Polymer Testing, 99, 107206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107206.  

Lasdon, L., Fox, R., & Ratner, M. (1974). Nonlinear optimization using the generalized reduced gradient method. Informatique et Recherche Opérationn, 3, 73–103.

Li, J., Jia, Y., Li, T., Zhu, Z., Zhou, H., Peng, X., & Jiang, S. (2020). Tensile Behavior of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene at Different Temperatures. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2020, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8946591.

Rauchs, G., & Bardon, J. (2011). Identification of elasto-viscoplastic material parameters by indentation testing and combined finite element modelling and numerical optimization. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 47(7), 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.01.008.

Samy, A.A., Golbang, A., Harkin-Jones, E., Archer, E., Dahale, M., McAfee, M., Abdi, B., & McIlhagger, A. (2022). Influence of Raster Pattern on Residual Stress and Part Distortion in FDM of Semi-Crystalline Polymers: A Simulation Study. Polymers, 14(13), 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132746.

Webbe Kerekes, T., Lim, H., Joe, W.Y., & Yun, G.J. (2019). Characterization of process–deformation/damage property relationship of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D-printed specimens. Additive Manufacturing, 25, 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.008.

Yang, H., & Zhang, S. (2018). Numerical simulation of temperature field and stress field in fused deposition modeling. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32(7), 3337–3344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-0636-4.

Zhang, W., Cho, C., & Xiao, Y. (2014). An effective inverse procedure for identifying viscoplastic material properties of polymer Nafion. Computational Materials Science, 95, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.033.